Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> This reasonably sets a floor

I disagree wrt reasonableness. It’s just too big a leap. There are a lot of crimes, and not many land you on death row.



The observation was that death row represents the highest level of scrutiny, and still had 10% false positives for guilt.

Is there any argument that less-scrutinized cases would have a lower level of false convictions?


The 10% claim has been refuted.


What % is it?


Read other replies. I don't think we have enough data to give an opinion exact number but less than 1


Why would you expect those cases to have lower rates of false conviction than normal cases?


Hoo boy, welcome to the history of the United states.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: