> But giving a good answer is just as core as their search results.
What I'm saying is all Google has to do is stop giving those types of "custom" answers it already has. No one will abandon using Search if it goes away.
> It's not any stupider to use that info than a dedicated site. Both could be wrong, and you're not a moron if it is.
It is. Using a well vetted, dedicated app is the way to go, and it's extremely unlikely to be wrong - especially for something like sunset times. You know the dedicated app/site is, well, dedicated to providing that information. They exist to provide that information.
Whereas the (pre-LLM) quick answers Google gave? All opaque. And smart people always knew that information being accurate was not something that matters that much to Google.
To borrow an analogy, installing a dedicated app starts at negative one hundred points. The risk of bad behavior and junky ads needs a lot of use to overcome. I'm not sure where "well vetted" came from since your first post but doing that vetting takes much longer than getting the answer! And without vetting there's a good enough chance a dedicated site is worse than a dedicated Google widget (the ai is bottom of the barrel).
Let's not forget that Google's actual sunset widget does a good job.
What I'm saying is all Google has to do is stop giving those types of "custom" answers it already has. No one will abandon using Search if it goes away.
> It's not any stupider to use that info than a dedicated site. Both could be wrong, and you're not a moron if it is.
It is. Using a well vetted, dedicated app is the way to go, and it's extremely unlikely to be wrong - especially for something like sunset times. You know the dedicated app/site is, well, dedicated to providing that information. They exist to provide that information.
Whereas the (pre-LLM) quick answers Google gave? All opaque. And smart people always knew that information being accurate was not something that matters that much to Google.